 |
Persistence Pays!
By Barbara McAdorey
After 10 months of trying to get answers from
Health Canada as to why the Canadian Health Network (CHN) website
fails to give any information about abortion from a pro-life perspective,
why CHN provides abortion related information almost exclusively
from abortion-rights groups, and what the CHN management team plans
to do with the numerous suggestions I gave back in September, 2003,
for how the coverage of abortion could be improved...after an arduous
10-month process of frustration, I have a bit of good news to report:
CHN Executive Director Catherine Drew told me in a July 16 email
that one of the brochures which I strongly objected to was in the
process of being “unpublished” from CHN’s website.
I checked the website, and indeed it has been removed!
It is the offensive, inaccurate, and out-of-date brochure called
“Prenatal Development,” published by Childbirth By Choice
Trust which I referred to when I first wrote about CHN’s pro-abortion
bias in a Special Report in the Sept/Oct’03 issue of LifeCanada
News – a brochure which compares the developing human child
to a guinea pig and a monkey.
As I mentioned in the special report, the CHN website is a government-sponsored,
health-related website whose motto “Health Information You
can Trust” belied the website’s content. CHN seriously
downplays the health risks associated with abortion and only presents
information from a pro-abortion-rights perspective. And is it any
wonder, given that Planned Parenthood Federation of Canada (PPFC)
was the Affiliate for the Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) topic
of the CHN website? (Affiliates are responsible for selecting content
for their topic areas.)
At that time, I was in contact with CHN media spokesperson Emmanuel
Chabot. He set up a telephone interview for me on November 28 with
CHN Executive Director Catherine Drew and CHN Manager Valerie Jerabek.
I had a number of questions to ask, but all I could find out from
Ms. Drew and Ms. Jerabek was that the CHN content was in the process
of being reviewed and everything was in a state of flux. They would
not acknowledge that an entire perspective on abortion was being
censored. I was given less than 15 minutes, then the interview was
terminated.
Mr. Chabot agreed to take my unanswered questions in written form
and give them to the CHN management team to respond to me in writing.
I sent those questions via email that same day.
It was around this time LifeCanada learned that CHN was in the process
of selecting Affiliates for the upcoming term. Was it possible that
PPFC’s days as SRH Affiliate were numbered?
|
 |