Proposed Criminal Offence
for Murdering Unborn Child
“Domestic violence statistics against
pregnant women show that something has to be done”
Yorkton – Garry Breitkreuz,
MP for Yorkton-Melville, took another bold step in his ten-year
fight to protect the rights of unborn children. On March 10, he
introduced a Private Member’s Motion M-560 that calls on the
government to create a new criminal code offence for the murder
of an unborn child. “Parliament must send a clear message
to anyone contemplating using deadly force against a pregnant woman,”
said Breitkreuz.
Motion M-560 states: That, in the opinion of this House, the government
should introduce an amendment to the Criminal Code of Canada creating
a new offence to ensure that any person who murders a woman knowing
that she is pregnant, shall be charged with the murder of the unborn
child.
“I started looking into this issue after reading an article
by Mike McIntyre titled ‘Homicide doesn’t apply to the
unborn’ in the Winnipeg Free Press,” said Breitkreuz.
The news item published on March 1, 2004, stated: In fact, the violent
“expiration” of the pregnancies won’t even register
as a crime statistic. Such is the law in Canada, where a fetus –
even if full term – has no legal standing. “It is an
absolute tragedy. These were babies, which otherwise were going
to be born alive,” said Dr. Charlie Ferguson, head of the
child-protection centre at Children’s Hospital. Ferguson said
the abortion debate shouldn’t get mixed up with this issue,
because of the fact the mother presumably had every intention of
giving birth before her demise. “The idea of pregnant women
being killed is about as gruesome as a crime as you can get, the
idea two people are being killed but only one is recognized in law,”
he said.
“The news story and what I found out with just a few days
of research convinced me something had to be done,” stated
Breitkreuz. “The Library of Parliament researchers confirmed
what the Winnipeg Free Press reporter found out, that Statistics
Canada doesn’t even keep statistics on the number of pregnant
women that are murdered. However, they did find two reports, one
by the Maryland Department of Health that found that the leading
cause of death among pregnant or recently pregnant women was homicide,
and the second by Peel Regional Council in Ontario reporting that
21% of abused women were assaulted during pregnancy (Statistics
Canada, 1994),” reported Breitkreuz.
“I don’t know why Statistics Canada doesn’t collect
this important life and death information. But from the research
available, it seems that pregnant women are more at risk of being
assaulted and murdered. This means that their unborn children are
also at risk. I’m not going to wait years for the Liberal
government to get its act together. Murderers should face two life
terms if they murder a pregnant woman and her baby,” declared
Breitkreuz.
(Editor’s note: A Motion, unlike a Bill, simply
indicates the will of Parliament. Selection of Motions for debate
is based on a sort of lottery. If Mr. Breitkreuz’s name is
drawn, he could pick one of his bills or motions for debate, and
if he picked M-560 and it was debated in the House of Commons and
passed at the vote, it would indicate that Parliament has the will
to work on developing such legislation; if it lost, it would be
like Parliament saying it is not interested in pursuing legislation
on this matter.)
|